arXiv preprint ·
How Reliable are AMR Parser Outputs? Uncertainty Estimation for AMR Parsing
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Recent advances have significantly improved the performance of Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) parsers, yet determining when their outputs can be trusted remains largely unexplored. This work presents the first study of uncertainty estimation for AMR parsers in a black-box setting using top-k beam-search candidates. Uncertainty is estimated from pairwise candidate similarities and evaluated using the Prediction Rejection Ratio. This work characterises the relationship between parsing performance and uncertainty, evaluates the reliability of beam candidate distributions, analyses the effect of evaluation metrics on uncertainty assessment, and identifies parsers that provide the strongest balance between performance and reliability. Experimental results show the value of uncertainty estimation as a complementary dimension for evaluating AMR parsers.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
When Charts Deceive Web Agents: A Paired Benchmark for Misleading Visualization-Grounded Tasks
Scaling Laws for Multimodal Data Mixtures
COFFEQA: Counterfactual-Guided Few-Shot Distillation for LLM Question Answering
MemForm: Benchmarking Memory Formation Poisoning in LLM Agents
Fear Is Not Always Fear: Variation in Emotion Label Equivalence Across Datasets
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.