arXiv preprint ·
Human and LLM Facilitation in Collaborative Design Meetings: A Computational Behavioral Comparison
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being explored as facilitators of group discussion and collaborative work, but the behavioral differences between LLM-generated and human facilitation remain insufficiently characterized. We compare human Project Manager facilitation turns from scenario-based collaborative design meetings with Llama 3.1 8B Instruct responses across 199 paired contexts from the AMI Meeting Corpus. The analysis covers five confirmatory dimensions: contextual semantic distance, a lexical elaboration proxy, empathyand-hedge lexical density, topic divergence, and phase-vocabulary alignment. An exploratory directiveness measure failed domain validation and is not interpreted. The sampled human Project Manager turns were higher on contextual semantic distance (r = 0.644) and on empathyand-hedge lexical density (r = 0.203). The second contrast is carried mainly by hedge terms, so we read it as lexical hedging rather than psychological empathy. Llama-generated facilitation was higher on topic divergence (r = 0.703), the lexical elaboration proxy (r = 0.288; lengthconfounded), and instruction-conditioned phase-vocabulary alignment (r = 0.382). A secondary no-phase check left the Llama-higher phase contrast in place. The system prompt still requested a facilitation move, so that check is not evidence of spontaneous phase awareness. These differences should not be interpreted as a ranking of facilitation quality. The resulting behavioral profile provides a reference point for later comparisons of LLM facilitators, human facilitators, prompts, models, and collaborative settings.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Inverse Synthesis of Shock Time Series from Shock Response Spectra Using Ensembles of Conditional Variational Autoencoders
PotentialEP: Backprop-Free Training of CIFAR-Scale Generative Models via Equilibrium Propagation
TreeHCA: Hindsight-Guided Exploration and Credit Assignment for Multi-Turn LLM Agents
Coarse-Graining Recursive Expert Computation: Continuation-Relative Interfaces and Failure Modes
Scalable Learning of Determinantal Point Processes with Kernel-Structured Interactions
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.