arXiv preprint ·
Mind the Spatial Gap: A Benchmark for Geospatial Reasoning and Constrained Spatial Editing
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Understanding and manipulating spatial relations is fundamental to AI systems that reason about physical environments and construct grounded world models. However, existing evaluations of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for spatial reasoning rely predominantly on static question-answering (QA) over small-scale or synthetic scenes, rarely probing whether models can modify spatial configurations while satisfying explicit geometric constraints. We introduce GeoSpatialBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate an escalating progression of spatial cognition, ranging from spatial relation understanding and geometric reasoning to constrained spatial editing. Grounded in real-world urban data across six geographically diverse cities, GeoSpatialBench evaluates a comprehensive taxonomy of 28 topological, directional, metric, and ordering relations across structured GeoJSON and map image modalities, with ground-truth references and constraints verified via GIS operations. Our empirical evaluation across frontier MLLMs uncovers a stark spatial gap: structured GeoJSON consistently outperforms map images, with multimodal combinations offering no reliable gain over GeoJSON alone, and while models show reasonable competence on qualitative topological and ordering, performance drops on quantitative metric relations. Crucially, editing performance on ordering relations declines relative to QA, and most failed edits violate at least one specified spatial constraint. These results highlight a gap between passively recognizing spatial relations and actively manipulating geometric configurations. GeoSpatialBench provides an open, rigorous diagnostic testbed to benchmark these spatial limitations, laying essential empirical groundwork for physically grounded world models and embodied spatial AI.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Reward Hacking as a Transmissible Strategy in Multi-Agent Coding Systems
Coarse-Graining Recursive Expert Computation: Continuation-Relative Interfaces and Failure Modes
COFFEQA: Counterfactual-Guided Few-Shot Distillation for LLM Question Answering
Frustratingly Easy Agentic RAG via Portable Skills: A Case Study in Customer Support
Neural networks are more modular than single neurons suggest
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.