arXiv preprint ·
Spatial Context or Memory? Sizing the Inputs of Neural Surrogates for Partially Observed Fields
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Neural surrogates that forecast a physical field from sparse, noisy sensors read a window of nearby sensors and a history of past snapshots. Practitioners choose both by comparing fitted models with each other. Such comparisons cannot tell a model's shortfall from missing information. We measure the trade-off between window and history against the Bayes-optimal error of the same readings. An exact Gaussian analysis shows that noisy or sparse observation of a field with local dynamics makes the optimal forecast read distant sensors only through spatial correlation. On a forced linear field with a known optimum, trained models that read only the window come within 1% of it. We then train such models on viscous Burgers flow and the chaotic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky (KS) equation, with every deciding comparison fixed before any test evaluation. In every field except KS, eight snapshots remove a smaller fraction of the one-snapshot error as the lead time, the number of steps to the forecast target, grows. In KS, for windows up to one correlation length, they remove a larger fraction. This lead-time inversion persists across sensor densities, three architectures and a two-dimensional domain. It shrinks as damping lowers the Lyapunov exponent. Damping also removes the linear instability of KS. We therefore tie the inversion to instability and leave chaos and linear amplification unseparated. For surrogate design the results give two rules. Size the window in correlation lengths of the field. Split a fixed input budget between window and history for the lead time the model will serve, because the best split moves toward wider windows as the lead time grows. In Burgers flow the split chosen at lead time one ends with 13.5 times the best error at lead time eight.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Mid-Training Language Models on Raw Video
Inverse Synthesis of Shock Time Series from Shock Response Spectra Using Ensembles of Conditional Variational Autoencoders
A Graph Neural Network for Global Daily Fire Radiative Power Prediction at Medium-Range Lead Times
TreeHCA: Hindsight-Guided Exploration and Credit Assignment for Multi-Turn LLM Agents
NOMOS: Compiling Written Policies into Statically Verified Tool-Call Gates for LLM Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.