arXiv preprint ·
SynAct: Synergistic Active Feedback Learning for LLM Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
LLM agents executing multi-step workflows fail in two fundamentally different ways: recoverable slips, which further attempts can repair, and knowledge gaps, which retrying cannot resolve. Expert feedback can address the latter, but expert attention is scarce. The key challenge is therefore not whether to ask for feedback, but where feedback can change the outcome. Existing approaches either avoid expert feedback, allowing agents to reinforce their own errors, or allocate feedback at the task level without identifying consequential decisions. We present SynAct, an active learning framework that treats expert attention as the binding constraint and allocates feedback at the level of individual decisions. SynAct ranks decisions by the mutual information between the selected action and the terminal outcome across repeated rollouts, queries an expert at the highest-value decisions, and distills the resulting corrections into transferable rules that the agent can reuse without expert access at deployment. We theoretically characterize what this signal identifies under finite repeated sampling: with k rollouts and at least m observations per action, outcome-constant decisions have zero mutual information, while outcome-separating decisions have mutual information at least H2(m/k) bits, yielding exact separation for any threshold t in (0,H2(m/k)). This also explains why success-based acquisition can be blind when all rollouts fail: success is constant even when failed runs reach different outcomes. Across four agent benchmarks and four models spanning three families, SynAct improves held-out accuracy in all 16 evaluated settings, by +11.7pp on average. The same signal transfers to inference-time routing, where SynAct outperforms budget-matched cascade, uncertainty, and expert-judge routers in 15 of 16 settings, while a single targeted correction outperforms seven additional unaimed retries.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Mid-Training Language Models on Raw Video
Inverse Synthesis of Shock Time Series from Shock Response Spectra Using Ensembles of Conditional Variational Autoencoders
A Graph Neural Network for Global Daily Fire Radiative Power Prediction at Medium-Range Lead Times
TreeHCA: Hindsight-Guided Exploration and Credit Assignment for Multi-Turn LLM Agents
NOMOS: Compiling Written Policies into Statically Verified Tool-Call Gates for LLM Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.