arXiv preprint ·
ReSI: Recursive Safety Improvement toward Resistant and Resilient AI
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Recursive self-improvement, the participation of AI systems in improving their own capabilities, is beginning to move from theoretical prospect to practice, posing both challenges and opportunities for safety alignment. Models evolve through frequent updates, and their safety alignment requires continual adaptation to each new checkpoint. Meanwhile, with evolving red-teaming methods exposing new vulnerabilities, safety improvement for each checkpoint needs to mitigate exposed vulnerabilities and generalize to risks not yet revealed. Following R$^2$AI, we term these goals resistance to known threats and resilience to unforeseen risks. Recursive self-improvement, in turn, inspires an approach to both goals: safety alignment could likewise advance through successive rounds of evaluation and update. We therefore introduce ReSI, a recursive safety improvement framework that implements this approach through automated research. In each round, ReSI applies diverse red-teaming methods to identify vulnerabilities in the current target model, develops training recipes, and promotes the update with the largest safety gain among those passing a Pareto gate on capability retention as the next target model. Across four dense and mixture-of-experts models, ReSI matches or exceeds evaluated frontier models on in-distribution and out-of-distribution safety benchmarks, and outperforms alignment baselines on nearly all safety evaluations while largely preserving general capabilities. In particular, ReSI reduces the mean X-Teaming attack success rate across the four models from 86.01% to 31.45%, well below GPT-5.6-Luna's leading frontier result of 56.69%, indicating stronger resilience to attacks unseen during training. These findings support recursive safety improvement as a practical path toward resistant and resilient AI.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
NOMOS: Compiling Written Policies into Statically Verified Tool-Call Gates for LLM Agents
Reward Hacking as a Transmissible Strategy in Multi-Agent Coding Systems
Language Modeling is Monotone Compression
The False Allure of "Security by Obscurity": A Game-Theoretic Approach
False Claims, Credible Images: A Red-Teaming Benchmark for Commercial Image Generators
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.