arXiv preprint ·
Poster: A Preliminary Study of LLM Distillation Inference
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1145/3830454.3846416
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Unauthorized model distillation, in which a model is trained on the outputs of a proprietary large language model (LLM), is a growing threat to model providers. We study distillation inference: determining whether a suspect model was distilled from another model or trained independently. We formulate this problem as a hypothesis test and estimate the behavior expected under each hypothesis by training shadow models: distilled shadow models learn from the teacher's reasoning traces, whereas independent shadow models learn only from reference answers. The auditor measures how closely each model predicts the teacher's reasoning outputs and then uses the shadow models to convert the suspect's score into a calibrated p-value. In a preliminary study using Qwen2.5-7B as the teacher and Llama-3.2-3B for the suspects, our test achieves a true positive rate of 1.0 at a significance level of 0.02. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using distillation inference to detect distillation attacks.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
NOMOS: Compiling Written Policies into Statically Verified Tool-Call Gates for LLM Agents
Reward Hacking as a Transmissible Strategy in Multi-Agent Coding Systems
Language Modeling is Monotone Compression
The False Allure of "Security by Obscurity": A Game-Theoretic Approach
False Claims, Credible Images: A Red-Teaming Benchmark for Commercial Image Generators
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.