arXiv preprint ·
Uncovering and Fixing Collider Bias in Bayesian PINNs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Bayesian physics-informed neural networks (B-PINNs) are a popular framework for parameter and state inference from sparse or noisy observations. They are commonly formulated via a collider structure, in which physical and trajectory parameters are assumed to be a priori independent and become coupled through virtual likelihoods on differential-equation residuals that enforce physical consistency. We show that this modeling choice can induce severe systematic bias in the posterior over physical parameters: even when the prior is favorably centered on the ground-truth parameters, the resulting posterior can drift away and concentrate far from them. As a remedy, we advocate a hierarchical chain model in which physics generates trajectories, which in turn generate observations. The chain model does not suffer from this posterior bias, but it poses a harder, so-called doubly intractable, inference problem due to a physics-dependent normalization constant. This challenge can be resolved by discretizing the underlying stochastic dynamics, after which the chain posterior can be sampled exactly with particle MCMC. We identify two distinct mechanisms characterizing the collider bias, derive analytical approximations of their magnitudes, and establish diagnostic criteria for predicting when standard B-PINNs remain reliable. Experiments confirm the predicted bias and show that the chain formulation successfully avoids it.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Mid-Training Language Models on Raw Video
Reward Hacking as a Transmissible Strategy in Multi-Agent Coding Systems
Intent Graph: Navigating the Analytical Reasoning Space for Exploratory Data Analysis
COFFEQA: Counterfactual-Guided Few-Shot Distillation for LLM Question Answering
NOMOS: Compiling Written Policies into Statically Verified Tool-Call Gates for LLM Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.