arXiv preprint ·
Defensive Writing in GPT Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Researchers increasingly use ChatGPT to revise their papers, and when asked to make a paper hold up under review, recent GPT versions often narrow or even retract the authors' claims. We call such changes defensive writing when the given material does not support them, and we test two explanations: the model corrects the authors' overclaiming, or it writes for an anticipated reviewer. We ask GPT versions and models from other developers to rewrite paragraphs from papers written before ChatGPT, or to write from an evidence sheet that lists a paper's method and results. From GPT-5.5 on, GPT versions add clearly more ungrounded qualifications than the authors' originals contain, and GPT-6-astra adds the most and often retracts the authors' claims. Each explanation fits one part. Checked against the full papers, GPT-6-astra's retractions mostly correct overstated claims or explanations, but most added qualifications are redundant. The qualifications follow the request: they are absent under polishing, appear with any request to check the claims, and peak when the prompt names a reviewer's concerns. AI reviewers score such rewrites higher and score them lower once only the qualifications are removed, while human readers in a small study find them harder to read. Combining AI writing with AI review may reward qualifications that readers pay for.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Mid-Training Language Models on Raw Video
Reward Hacking as a Transmissible Strategy in Multi-Agent Coding Systems
Intent Graph: Navigating the Analytical Reasoning Space for Exploratory Data Analysis
COFFEQA: Counterfactual-Guided Few-Shot Distillation for LLM Question Answering
NOMOS: Compiling Written Policies into Statically Verified Tool-Call Gates for LLM Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.