arXiv preprint ·
Open-ended Scientific Discovery with Possibilistic Reasoning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Autonomous scientific discovery with LLMs requires generating and testing hypotheses adaptively as evidence accumulates while maintaining statistical validity. Existing anytime-valid methods can handle data-dependent hypotheses, but open-ended discovery poses a deeper challenge: the best discovered hypothesis may still be the best of a bad lot, with better explanations yet undiscovered, while even background knowledge such as physical laws may require revision in light of new findings. In response, we formalize the problem as Abductive Autonomous Scientific Discovery (AASD) using possibility theory. We introduce abductive utility, a computable measure of discovery progress, and possibility frontier search, the first algorithm for AASD, which maintains anytime validity and achieves $\varepsilon$-optimal abductive utility asymptotically under suitable conditions. Experiments on synthetic and real-world scientific-discovery tasks show strong performance.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Regularized Small Area Estimation with Graph Laplacian Benchmarking priors
Two-way Guidance: Simultaneous Learning of Summary Statistics for Generative Bayes
How to post-train on a surrogate: Envelope sampling mitigates reward hacking
From Imbalance to Evidence: Deep Nonparametric Testing for Complex Data under Severe Sample Imbalance
Spatial Prediction with Guided Diffusion
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.