arXiv preprint ·

Attainable Boundaries versus Operational Equivalence: Dual Benchmarks for the Hierarchical Assessment of Quantum Resources

Sunho Kim, Chunhe Xiong and Junde Wu

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Quantum Physics

Abstract

While conventional quantum resource theories quantify utility relative to an idealized set of free states, practical implementations are confined to a specific supply environment---a framework encompassing all states realizable or preparable via current experimental apparatus and design choices, not limited to free states. This work proposes a novel framework for evaluating the relative utility of arbitrary quantum states against the resource set made accessible by these current selections. We specifically focus our investigation on two canonical representations: the set of states reachable via free operations as the attainable boundary imposed by current experimental constraints, and the set defined through numerical optimization as the criterion for operational equivalence. Our framework establishes two core evaluation methodologies. First, we provide a strategy-dependent benchmark by assessing a state's performance relative to the reference set under its individually optimized strategy, thereby quantifying achievable performance. Second, we derive a computable lower bound on this superiority by considering optimal strategies for each state individually, enabling the quantification of strategy-independent relative performance independent of specific experimental setups. Beyond relative efficiency metrics, we demonstrate the practical utility of this approach for resource management scenarios, including the selective extraction of states advantageous for storage and distribution, and the concentration of residual resources. Using quantum entanglement as a paradigmatic example, we prove that distillable entanglement can be fully recovered via extraction and concentration when the reference set is restricted to pure states, thereby demonstrating the practical relevance of our framework.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Quantum Physics

Get the few papers worth your time in Quantum Physics every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics