arXiv preprint ·
When Citations Mislead? A Claim-Level Benchmark for Legal Hallucination Detection
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1145/3836937.3836948
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models are increasingly used in legal research and drafting, but they can still produce claims that sound convincing without being supported by the cited source. We introduce PARCEL, a benchmark for checking whether a legal claim is supported by the underlying authority. Using recent New York State Court of Appeals decisions, we build a dataset of 3,396 parenthetical-style claims labeled as Supported, Refuted, or Not Found. We cast this task as a three-way natural language inference problem and evaluate several state-of-the-art LLMs in a zero-shot setting. Although the strongest models reach up to 0.97 accuracy, the results also show an important weakness: models still incorrectly mark unsupported claims as supported, even when the full opinion text is provided. Across models, missing support is harder to detect than direct contradiction, and fabricated but plausible citations cause the largest drop in performance. Overall, PARCEL provides a practical benchmark for testing claim-level groundedness in legal RAG systems.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Adversarial Images Hijack Web Agents from Visual Grounding to Browser Execution
FedAlphaEdit: Null-Space-Aligned Merging for Collaborative Knowledge Editing
Dialect-Robust Speech Language Models with Synthetic Pseudo-Dialect Augmentation
Measuring and Mitigating Solution Mode Collapse in RLVR
OnlineQAT: On-Policy Distillation for Ultra-Low-Bit Large Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.