arXiv preprint ·
Cognitive Thermometers: Machine Learning and Logical Complexity
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
How does the human mind represent semantic categories? Why do natural languages favor certain meanings over others? Prior explanations have relied on logical definability and complexity, but these are highly sensitive to the choice of logical language, rendering some design choices unmotivated. In this article, we propose that machine learning provides a somewhat more agnostic approach to measuring semantic complexity. We review emerging evidence that logic and machine learning often yield converging results on relative complexity and its resulting effects in semantic typology. Where they diverge, learning appears to be a better explanation than logical complexity. We argue that treating machine learning models as ``cognitive thermometers'' enables a unified approach to complexity that bridges symbolic logic and connectionist AI.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Adversarial Images Hijack Web Agents from Visual Grounding to Browser Execution
FedAlphaEdit: Null-Space-Aligned Merging for Collaborative Knowledge Editing
Dialect-Robust Speech Language Models with Synthetic Pseudo-Dialect Augmentation
Measuring and Mitigating Solution Mode Collapse in RLVR
OnlineQAT: On-Policy Distillation for Ultra-Low-Bit Large Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.