arXiv preprint ·
Certified Corruption Budgets: Anytime-Valid Leaderboard Claims under Adaptive Rigging
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Public leaderboards for AI models are read continuously, and attackers can see every published standing. Vote rigging, selective disclosure of private variants, and benchmark contamination can each move a ranking. Existing guarantees assume genuine records or bound the corruption per step, which an attacker who corrupts in bursts evades. We introduce the certified corruption budget, a tolerance $\widehat{B}_t$ computed after $t$ records and published with each pairwise claim. With probability at least $1-α$, simultaneously at all times, the claim is correct or more than $\widehat{B}_t$ records were corrupted. It holds against attackers who watch every certificate, with no bound on their budget. Forged records and records altered once seen require different certificates: the certificate for forgeries fails, with probability approaching one, against an attacker who flips votes it has seen, while one that charges roughly twice as much per record remains valid, with constant bets even against attackers who see the future, and no smaller charge is valid at every level. The certified budget grows nearly as fast as any valid method allows: with a win fraction $\frac{1}{2}+δ$, each new record adds close to $2δ$ to the number of forged records the claim can withstand ($δ$ flipped). Publishing the best of $V$ private variants costs only an amount growing like $\log V$. In replays on 1.8 million Chatbot Arena votes, a few hundred rigged votes make standard confidence intervals certify false orderings, while ours stays valid. On real votes, our certificate shows that clearly separated models withstand about 2,000 forged votes.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Trustworthy Method Comparison with AI Judges: Estimation and Design under Order, Batch, and Aggregation Effects
Finite-Rank Logistic Gaussian Processes with Exact Likelihood for Conditional Density Estimation
A Functional Representation of Credit Behavior for Probability of Default Modeling
Cluster-Robust Prediction-Powered Inference
Beyond Marginal Monitoring: Distributed Joint-Distribution Testing for Data Concept Drift in Large Scale E-Commerce Operations
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.