arXiv preprint ·
How to train your model organism
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Model organisms of alignment-relevant behaviors (e.g., backdoors, sycophancy, spurious correlations) have emerged as a key tool for evaluating whitebox interpretability techniques. We argue that the prevailing practice of training model organisms to a single objective of installing the target behavior is insufficient and propose validating model organisms with respect to three objectives with associated metrics: target-behavior installation, general-capability preservation (i.e., parametric knowledge, chat quality), and output naturalness (i.e., CoT and activations). We re-visit two publicly released organism suites using this validation framework and show that (1) chat quality and CoT naturalness degrade substantially across training recipes, and (2) validation metrics predict how well interpretability methods recover the installed behavior, e.g., a logit lens readout covaries with an organism's general capabilities. We introduce a multi-objective training approach based on model merging to train more realistic model organisms. Finally, on a new suite of model organisms targeting demographic biases in clinical reasoning, we compare training recipes and find that DPO training stays closer to the base model than supervised finetuning, and the proposed model optimization approach better preserves capabilities and naturalness. Auditing this suite with an investigator agent, we again observe validation metrics tracking bias recovery. In sum, training methods shape the interpretability conclusions an organism supports, and we argue that one should consider multiple objectives to draw generalizable conclusions about interpretability methods using (realistic) model organisms.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
The Winner's Curse in LLM Self-Improvement Loops: Selection Noise, Lock-in, and Acceptance Rules
Mid-Training Language Models on Raw Video
Beyond Nominal Equilibria: Risk-Averse Multi-Population Mean-Field Games
A Graph Neural Network for Global Daily Fire Radiative Power Prediction at Medium-Range Lead Times
An Informational Curse of Horizon in Goal-Conditioned Policy Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.