arXiv preprint ·
ExperienceIndex: Artifact-Grounded Memory
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Knowledge-intensive tasks require answering many questions by reasoning about a shared corpus of artifacts (e.g., court cases, or scientific literature). As humans interact with these corpora, they naturally accumulate experiential knowledge about artifacts, enabling them to quickly identify the complete set of relevant artifacts for each new task. However, existing AI agents lack appropriate memory solutions to build or reuse such artifact-grounded experience, leading to lower answer quality and higher online cost. Existing memory solutions extract and reuse information from prior task-solving traces, but they primarily focus on user preferences, factual attributes, or abstract reasoning patterns rather than persistent artifact-specific knowledge. We introduce ExperienceIndex, a novel experience layer for AI agents that captures and reuses knowledge about artifacts based on prior reasoning traces. ExperienceIndex stores two complementary forms of experience: (i) single-artifact experiences that summarize an artifact's contribution to prior tasks and (ii) artifact-pair experiences that encode structural relationships discovered during past reasoning. Integrated as lightweight middleware, ExperienceIndex uses an experience retrieval mechanism to guide agents toward the complete set of relevant artifacts for new tasks, improving both answer quality and efficiency. Across diverse corpora and agentic solutions with different search frameworks, ExperienceIndex delivers consistent gains, raising answer quality by up to 11.0 points and reducing online dollar cost by up to 50.5%. We further demonstrate two benefits: (i) cross-task generalization, where experiences accumulated from text-to-SQL tasks transfer to factoid QA tasks over the same artifact corpus, and (ii) teacher-student learning, where experiences from a stronger model enable a weaker model to reach comparable performance.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Reading Position Is the Baseline to Beat: A Time-Ordered Evaluation of Personalised Highlight Prediction
Gated Memory: Admission-Controlled Memory Formation for Conversational AI
From Chunks to Functional Evidence: Function-Aware Retrieval for EDA Documentation QA
H2CE: Modeling Geo-Semantic Interactions for POI Reranking with Heterogeneous Two-Stage Cross-Encoders
Finding the Right Balance: Relevance and Diversity in LLM Retrieval
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.