arXiv preprint ·
What the Sleeve Feels: Explainable Machine Learning for Textile Pressure-Based Postural Screening
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Pressure-sensing smart textiles convert body-surface contact into a dense, image-like signal closely tied to posture and movement, making them a promising low-cost route to wearable posture screening. Realizing that promise, however, requires more than classification accuracy: a deployable system must generalize to wearers unseen during training, expose the physical evidence behind its decisions, and tolerate the small donning offsets that occur whenever a garment is removed and re-worn. This paper addresses these three requirements jointly using a knitted piezoresistive sleeve worn on the forearm as a testbed. We regroup fine-grained everyday activities into three coarser screening categories (neutral, potentially undesirable, and functional or transitional), engineer 29 interpretable pressure-distribution features spanning global intensity, spatial center of pressure, quadrant asymmetry, distribution complexity, and short-horizon temporal change, and evaluate under a strict subject-wise split. A tuned XGBoost classifier reaches 0.818 accuracy, 0.788 balanced accuracy, and 0.801 macro F1 on unseen test subjects, with tight frame-level bootstrap 95% intervals of about plus-minus 0.01 and a subject-to-subject standard deviation near 0.06 under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. A simple 2D-CNN baseline trained on raw frames achieves broadly similar performance, showing that hand-engineered features are not left behind by a learned spatial representation on this task. SHAP-based explanation, a feature-group ablation, per-activity error analysis inside the pooled undesirable class, class-mapping sensitivity, and a simulated donning-rotation stress test together locate what the model relies on, where it degrades, and why, directly targeting the generalization, interpretability, and robustness gaps that determine whether such a system is deployable.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
The Winner's Curse in LLM Self-Improvement Loops: Selection Noise, Lock-in, and Acceptance Rules
Mid-Training Language Models on Raw Video
Adversarial Images Hijack Web Agents from Visual Grounding to Browser Execution
Intent Graph: Navigating the Analytical Reasoning Space for Exploratory Data Analysis
We Query, Therefore We Compute: On Oracle Computation beyond the Machine, with an Application to Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.