arXiv preprint ·
Identifiability of a dissipative knowledge-dynamics model: exact recovery under designed excitation, degeneration on observational data
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Human learning is a dissipative dynamical process: mastery accumulates through practice, decays through forgetting, and propagates across interdependent concepts. We model it as a nonlinear dissipative system of ordinary differential equations whose parameters are mechanistically meaningful (a transfer-of-practice matrix, per-concept forgetting rates, and a saturating practice-response gain), and we study when those parameters can actually be recovered from data. For two concepts, we prove a constructive structural identifiability theorem for the associated inverse problem under explicit excitation conditions, together with monotonicity, robustness and L-stability results. We derive an implicit L-stable scheme and a batched solver numerically equivalent to the per-trajectory formulation (bit-exact predictions, gradients to $10^{-10}$) yet two orders of magnitude faster, making estimation feasible on cohorts of $2.5\times10^4$ learners. The empirical study is two-sided. Under the theorem's excitation conditions, synthetic recovery is exact: parameters to machine precision, coupling structure at $F_1 = 1.0$. On large observational benchmarks it is not. An apparently strong recovery, with forgetting rates correlating with topic error rates at Spearman $ρ= 0.83$, is refuted by four controls: it survives destroying the temporal order of the data, is matched by a classical Bayesian baseline, and is unaffected by removing real timestamps. We trace this to the stationary structure of the model and show that it is consistent with the degeneration anticipated by the theory in the absence of designed excitation. The result delineates a boundary between identifiable and unidentifiable regimes and motivates controls for interpretability claims.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Beyond Nominal Equilibria: Risk-Averse Multi-Population Mean-Field Games
From Geometry to Generalization: Why Row Normalization Can Beat Adam and Muon
The Geometry of Anisotropic Dilation for Optimal Regularization
Deflating the Hessian: Rank-4 W4A4 Quantization for Multimodal Diffusion Transformers
Global Exponential Convergence of Two-Layer Linear Network Training
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.