arXiv preprint ·
The Impact of Backbone Evolution on LLM-Based Relevance Assessments
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
LLMs are evolving rapidly, with newer models offering stronger capabilities. This suggests that in LLM-based relevance judging, more capable models will achieve higher agreement with human judgements under the same prompt. We challenge this understanding by investigating the behavior of LLM-based relevance judges under backbone evolution. Keeping the prompts fixed, we evaluate a representative single-prompt (UMBRELA) and a rubric-based prompt (EXAM) across sequential model versions of commercial (Gemini, GPT) and open-weight (Qwen, Llama) models. Overall, we find no consistent evidence that newer versions lead to better relevance judges. Crucially, similar or improved aggregate performance does not imply judgment stability: correct judgements made by an earlier version of an LLM backbone are not necessarily preserved by later versions. We investigate the potential drivers of these regressions. Our findings caution against the assumption that judging prompts designed and validated for one backbone version will perform equivalently or better when the model is updated, even within the same family.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
Reading Position Is the Baseline to Beat: A Time-Ordered Evaluation of Personalised Highlight Prediction
Gated Memory: Admission-Controlled Memory Formation for Conversational AI
From Chunks to Functional Evidence: Function-Aware Retrieval for EDA Documentation QA
H2CE: Modeling Geo-Semantic Interactions for POI Reranking with Heterogeneous Two-Stage Cross-Encoders
Finding the Right Balance: Relevance and Diversity in LLM Retrieval
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.