arXiv preprint ·
Robust distortion riskmetrics under Wasserstein ambiguity
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Risk evaluation under distributional ambiguity is central to decision making in finance, economics, and operations research. Wasserstein balls provide a natural way to describe uncertainty around a reference distribution. We solve a natural yet open problem of robust optimization for the class of distortion riskmetrics with Wasserstein distance as the sole ambiguity constraint. This chosen objective class does not require convexity, monotonicity, and continuity of distortion functions, encompassing many common risk measures and deviation measures. First, we characterize conditions under which direct convexification preserves the worst-case value. Second, we develop a constructive method for exact worst-case evaluation when the direct convexification conditions fail. Third, we construct explicit approximate worst-case distributions and provide computable error bounds to assess their accuracy without solving the exact problem. We apply these results to distributionally robust portfolio selection and use numerical experiments to assess approximation accuracy and the resulting portfolio decisions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Mathematical Finance
Diffusive Market Impact: A Consistent Microfoundation
Optimal Investment to Reach a Financial Goal: A Stochastic Control Framework
Restricted Entropic and Quadratic Hedging in the Small-Risk-Aversion Limit
A Hawkes Microfoundation for Multitype Inverse Gaussian Subordinators
Three options are roughly enough - Variance-optimal semi-static hedging in the rough Heston model
Get the few papers worth your time in Mathematical Finance every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.