arXiv preprint ·
When does a network's training history predict its future learning better than its current state? Evidence from a response probe and a forecasting screen
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Networks that behave alike now can still learn differently when training continues. Work on loss of plasticity and critical periods shows that the path to a state shapes what follows; it does not show whether the path carries information that a measurement of the state itself misses. We ask when the training history of a network predicts its future learning better than its current state. In a main study, small multilayer perceptrons were trained under three history regimes (42 histories), and future learning was measured at four checkpoints by a short probe: a copy of the network trained for 100 updates on a new task. Before the prediction result was read, the protocol checked the probe. It responded monotonically to a function-preserving rescaling of hidden units, repeated measurements agreed (intraclass correlation 0.940, [0.903, 0.997], in the least reliable class, mean of three repeats), and a re-initialisation of units was visible directly after it but not 100 to 200 updates later. A history state of at most four dimensions did not improve on a calibrated model of the current state (gain -21.4%, 90% interval [-91.9, 8.1]; required in advance: 10%). A companion screen on 1,560 synthetic regression runs asked the same question for a target further away, the final error of the run. There, history models forecast better than the current validation error after 12 of up to 240 epochs (compact state 30.3%, [15.8, 39.4], a contextual comparison) and were not distinguishable from it after 48. In both studies the history was informative only while the current state was not yet informative about the target; this reading was formed after the results.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
The Winner's Curse in LLM Self-Improvement Loops: Selection Noise, Lock-in, and Acceptance Rules
Mid-Training Language Models on Raw Video
Beyond Nominal Equilibria: Risk-Averse Multi-Population Mean-Field Games
A Graph Neural Network for Global Daily Fire Radiative Power Prediction at Medium-Range Lead Times
An Informational Curse of Horizon in Goal-Conditioned Policy Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.