arXiv preprint ·
How Do LLMs Change Predictions Under Negation?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Negation is an essential feature of human language, yet large language models (LLMs) remain unreliable in processing it. We evaluate recent open-source and closed-source LLMs on our negation benchmark and find that, in 37-71% of cases, they repeat the same answer under negation (e.g., "Madrid" for "What is not the capital of Spain?"). To understand and address this brittleness, we mechanistically examine how models operate under negation. Our main finding is that specialized attention heads and MLP neurons jointly implement negation by (1) suppressing retrieval of the original answer (e.g., "Madrid") while (2) promoting a favored candidate within the answer category (e.g., "Paris"). This contrasts with accounts of human negation processing, in which information about the original answer helps to determine what should be excluded. Furthermore, we find that this difference from human processing is a key source of negation failures: the model's mechanism relies on suppressing the original answer rather than using it to determine what to exclude, so the model can repeat the original answer when suppression is too weak or when a bias toward particular answers prevents it from selecting an alternative. To address this weakness in the model's negation mechanism, we propose a training objective that requires larger shifts in answer preference for more confident original predictions, and show that it reduces negation failures with less degradation of general capabilities than standard fine-tuning baselines. Together, our results demonstrate how mechanistic analysis can reveal why a linguistic capability fails and guide training that targets the underlying limitation.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Adversarial Images Hijack Web Agents from Visual Grounding to Browser Execution
FedAlphaEdit: Null-Space-Aligned Merging for Collaborative Knowledge Editing
Dialect-Robust Speech Language Models with Synthetic Pseudo-Dialect Augmentation
Measuring and Mitigating Solution Mode Collapse in RLVR
OnlineQAT: On-Policy Distillation for Ultra-Low-Bit Large Language Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.