arXiv preprint ·
A Framework for the Systematic Review of ML Assets in AI Registries
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.09551
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
Modern software systems increasingly rely on Machine Learning (ML) assets (i.e., pre-trained models, datasets, benchmarks) for building, evaluating, and integrating ML-based systems. However, current exploration, selection and reuse practices of ML assets are not supported by systematic retrieval methodologies comparable to those used in traditional evidence synthesis. Consequently, in practice, ML asset selection is often presented as a settled design decision, supported by informal justification rather than a traceable, evidence-based, and updatable selection process. Aims: This paper explores how systematic review methods can support ML asset retrieval. In doing so, we aim to make their selection transparent and reproducible, grounded in explicit evidence, and ultimately better suited to its intended use. Method: We analyze established systematic review practices from scientific literature and adapt their phases (i.e., planning, conducting, and documenting) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) registries, treating ML assets as first-class units of analysis. The resulting framework integrates registry-aware search strategies, cross-registry schema alignment, and dependency-driven ML asset exploration. Results: We conceptualize ML asset retrieval as a systematic and reproducible process rather than an ad hoc activity, and propose a framework for structured ML asset discovery. \textbf{Conclusions:} This work illustrates how systematic review principles can be extended beyond scientific literature to support evidence synthesis over evolving AI registries.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
The Winner's Curse in LLM Self-Improvement Loops: Selection Noise, Lock-in, and Acceptance Rules
Mid-Training Language Models on Raw Video
Beyond Nominal Equilibria: Risk-Averse Multi-Population Mean-Field Games
A Graph Neural Network for Global Daily Fire Radiative Power Prediction at Medium-Range Lead Times
An Informational Curse of Horizon in Goal-Conditioned Policy Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.