arXiv preprint ·
Which Buildings Are Artificial Intelligence-Ready? A Measurement-Based Assessment Framework for AI Question Answering and Actuation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.09119
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
In brief
Can Your Building Talk to AI?
This paper proposes an auditable framework that separates what a building’s data could support from what an AI agent can actually do with it. In a simulated office, the agent reached 0.62 of a possible 0.64 answerable-readiness ceiling, while assessments of 37 public real-building graphs revealed a median ceiling of just 0.16.
What they found: On the simulated office, the reference agent realized 0.62 of a 0.64 answerable ceiling, suggesting the available data—not the agent—was the main limit. The exception was identifying the cause of a fault, where the agent did not realize the ceiling as closely. Across 37 public real-building graphs, the median answerable ceiling was 0.16; separately, the abstract reports that unlinked sensors lowered this ceiling in 15 of 45 graphs.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are becoming the interface to buildings, answering questions and controlling operations, but a building's readiness for them has not been systematically assessed. This study proposes a framework to quantify it. First, a building's knowledge graph sets two ceilings. The answerable-readiness ceiling is the share of operational questions its data could answer, and the actuation-readiness ceiling is the share of control actions it exposes. Second, a reference AI agent's accuracy on a fixed set of these questions shows how much of the ceilings is realized. On a simulated office, the agent realizes 0.62 of a 0.64 answerable ceiling, so missing data, not the AI, limit readiness, except in naming a fault's cause. Across 37 public real-building graphs, the median answerable ceiling is 0.16, and in 15 of 45, unlinked sensors lower it. The framework turns "is this building AI-ready?" into an auditable, ranked retrofit question.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM Simulations
The Winner's Curse in LLM Self-Improvement Loops: Selection Noise, Lock-in, and Acceptance Rules
A Systematic Investigation of Bias in Large Language Models for Advertising Relevance
Adversarial Images Hijack Web Agents from Visual Grounding to Browser Execution
Foundation Model-Aided Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Wireless Random Access Network Optimization
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.