arXiv preprint ·
The coupler Eve did not monitor: a black-box cavity cheat
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Eve receives two average photon counts, while a monitor watching for external leakage may register nothing. Can she conclude that Alice and Bob's opaque cavity devices did not communicate? We give a constructive counterexample: two independently operated controls activate a shared beam-splitter interaction after the inputs arrive. The parties report genuine sample averages, and a fixed local threshold converts these reports into a CHSH game with expected score $S=13/4$ for four repetitions per block, approaching $4$ for large blocks in the ideal model. This exceeds the usual $2\sqrt2$ quantum benchmark because the devices interact during their response. A separate dispersive-bus model explains how substantial exchange can coexist with a small probability of a click in a specified leakage monitor; an illustrative open-system calculation exhibits both effects without postselection. The output marginals nevertheless reveal signalling. The example separates three questions: whether the reports are honest, whether a monitored port is quiet, and whether the devices are physically isolated.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Quantum Physics
Quantum Darwinism through apparatus-mediated environmental recording
Witnessing Quantum Bayesian Inference beyond Classical Learning
Excitation of subradiant states in atom chains by surface plasmon waves
Cross-Validation of Open-Source Quantum Network Simulators
Spectroscopy using dipole-phonon quantum logic
Get the few papers worth your time in Quantum Physics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.