arXiv preprint ·
Talking with Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1080/0020174X.2026.2745114
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
When we interact with large language models (LLMs), are we having a conversation? They are designed to invite us to treat them as intelligent interlocutors who remember, act, and make commitments. But appearances deceive. We introduce the artifactual stance, a framework that reconceives human-AI interaction as artifact-mediated exchanges of candidate texts. LLM outputs are candidate texts optimized for utility, not utterances bearing meaning or force. LLMs are sophisticated text generators, not speakers. Between sessions, nothing runs; between turns, no one remembers. What persists is a configuration and a transcript. The "conversation" is a user's solo performance, interpretive labour disguised by interface and artifact design. This shift dissolves recent philosophical puzzles. Questions about what 'I' and 'you' refer to in AI exchanges, about whether systems can lie or be held to promises, about the identity of our supposed interlocutors all rest on a false presupposition. There is no speaker behind the screen, hence no one to refer to, no one to hold responsible. What feels like dialogue with someone is interaction with an artifact that generates text at unprecedented scale and fit. By abandoning the conversational framing, we see these systems for what they are: immensely sophisticated artifacts that afford varied uses. The philosophical questions that matter are about the normative underpinnings of design, adoption, authorization, and human practices of use.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Evaluating human-AI workflows for field research in viticulture
AI-Assisted Submissions in Online Research Are Rare and Highly Concentrated but Routinely Approved
From Algorithmic Marginalization to AI-Mediated Re-Centering: Can Culturally Grounded AI Bring Hakka Language and Culture Back into Mainstream Society?
The AI Evaluation Ecosystem
Detecting LLM-Assisted Vietnamese Writing via Keystrokes under Behavioral Manipulation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.