arXiv preprint ·
Psychological Safety in Software Engineering Teams: A Systematic Mapping Study of Team Processes and Performance
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.08896
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
Psychological safety is an important human and behavioral factor in software development teams, supporting collaboration, knowledge sharing, interpersonal risk-taking, and learning. However, evidence in software engineering remains fragmented across team processes, performance outcomes, contextual conditions, barriers. Objective: This study maps literature on psychological safety in software engineering, examining its conceptualization, associations with team performance and processes, contextual influences, barriers, and strengthening strategies. Method: We conducted a systematic mapping study following established software engineering guidelines. We analyzed 112 primary studies published between 2006 and June 2026 using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis across six research questions. Results: Psychological safety emerges as a multidimensional, context-dependent, team-level construct characterized by interpersonal risk-taking, open communication, collaboration, learning, trust, and supportive interaction. It is predominantly associated with productivity, software quality, innovation, team satisfaction, collaboration, communication, and decision-making. These relationships are shaped by leadership, organizational culture, work environment, trust, and sociocultural and individual conditions. Recurring barriers include communication problems, organizational constraints, leadership issues, diversity and inclusion challenges, and workload pressures. Although diverse practices are reported, evidence of their effectiveness and long-term sustainability remains limited. Conclusion: Psychological safety is a multidimensional, context-dependent team-level construct associated with team interaction and performance. This study highlights the need for longitudinal, context-sensitive research on psychological safety interventions in software development environments.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
The EPIC Framework for Spec-Driven Development
Who Broke Me? Execution-Guided Repair of Behavioral Dependency Breaks
CheckerBench: Can Long-Horizon Agents Synthesize Static-Analysis Checkers?
Beyond FAIR: A Fitness Function Framework for Sustainable Research Software
CISB-Bench: An Auditable Source--IR Dataset of Compiler-Introduced Security Bugs
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.