arXiv preprint ·
Agreement Is Not Validity: Cross-Model LLM Consensus in Diagnosing Student Failure Modes in K-12 Math Tutoring Dialogue
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
In K-12 mathematics tutoring, student-tutor dialogue provides rich evidence of learners' problem-solving processes and sources of difficulty. Learning analytics research increasingly relies on large language models (LLMs) to extract such information from dialogue for a variety of downstream tasks, including knowledge tracing, behavioral modeling, and diagnosis of student reasoning errors. However, the validity of these model-generated interpretations remains insufficiently understood. In this exploratory study, we examine the validity of LLM classifications of five student failure modes in mathematics tutoring dialogue using an operational diagnostic codebook: uncertainty, misattribution, operator selection, conceptual gap, and procedural slip. Across models, human-LLM agreement was moderate (kappa = .524-.597), while cross-model agreement was substantially higher (kappa = .755-.781; alpha = .769). These findings show that cross-model agreement can create a misleading appearance of correctness, challenging the assumption that consensus among LLMs constitutes evidence of valid learner interpretation. For learning analytics, the implication is clear: scalable labeling is useful only if the inferred constructs are valid, and model consensus cannot substitute for independent evidence of that validity.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM Simulations
Adversarial Images Hijack Web Agents from Visual Grounding to Browser Execution
Quality-Aware Self-Correcting Speech Translation on an Edge Device
Dialect-Robust Speech Language Models with Synthetic Pseudo-Dialect Augmentation
HouseholdBench: Evaluating Large Language Models as Predictors of Household Economic Behavior
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.