arXiv preprint ·
When does conformal calibration need censoring weights? Cause-of-failure prediction sets under competing risks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Split conformal prediction sets for competing-risks labels at a fixed horizon require calibration labels that right censoring can leave unobserved. Complete-case calibration guarantees coverage for the label-complete subpopulation, but its population coverage can deviate in either direction, even at the true class probabilities. We study how selection changes the score distribution near the population quantile. At the true score in our main simulation family, with independent draws, complete-case calibration covers 0.8723 at a nominal 0.900 when 22% of subjects are event-free at the horizon. In 4 of 48 further designs using per-draw normalisation, estimating cause incidences as one minus the exponential of the negative of the cause-specific Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazards, with the event-free probability as the clipped and renormalised remainder, puts complete-case coverage at least four standard errors below nominal. In these designs, weights from a correctly specified censoring model keep coverage near nominal. Extending the argument of Yi et al. (2025) to a cause label, we establish a finite-sample coverage lower bound with an explicit penalty for censoring-model error. Misspecifying the censoring model can also lead to under-coverage.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Methodology
Trustworthy Method Comparison with AI Judges: Estimation and Design under Order, Batch, and Aggregation Effects
Finite-Rank Logistic Gaussian Processes with Exact Likelihood for Conditional Density Estimation
A Functional Representation of Credit Behavior for Probability of Default Modeling
Cluster-Robust Prediction-Powered Inference
Beyond Marginal Monitoring: Distributed Joint-Distribution Testing for Data Concept Drift in Large Scale E-Commerce Operations
Get the few papers worth your time in Methodology every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.