arXiv preprint ·
Where Do Two Populations of Persistence Diagrams Differ? Calibrated Local Inference at a Fixed Budget
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Many two-sample tests for populations of persistence diagrams assess global differences without identifying the regions of the birth-death plane that contribute to them. We study simultaneous inference for local mean contrasts when the number of available diagrams is fixed. They are differences in expected weighted feature mass within $\ell_\infty$ neighborhoods at several centers and radii. We estimate these contrasts using additive landmark responses. A Gaussian multiplier bootstrap calibrates simultaneous confidence intervals while allowing unequal group covariances. The neighborhoods whose intervals exclude zero form a map with approximate family-wise error control, and selecting a subset of original intervals for display preserves their joint coverage guarantee. On the simultaneous coverage event, every reported neighborhood lies within twice its radius of the support of the mean-measure difference. A geometric result gives sufficient radius conditions for a displaced feature to produce a nonzero contrast. A comparison of sufficient detection thresholds quantifies the tradeoff between reducing the number of tested coordinates and reserving observations for an independent pilot. In simulations with 40 to 120 diagrams per class, the bands achieved 94%-98% simultaneous coverage under both the strict null and equal means with unequal covariances. In the latter setting, a permutation maximum and the pooled-t implementation of the two-stage persistence-image test of Moon and Lazar rejected in up to 32% and 26% of runs, respectively. In the fixed-budget simulations, spending a third of the observations on a pilot to choose landmarks or radii located changes less often than a prespecified grid at a single radius. On the MUTAG benchmark, the localized region concentrates on rings of fused-ring systems, an exploratory reading.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Methodology
Vine Copula VAR:From Recursive Margins to Joint Forecast Inference
Witnessing Quantum Bayesian Inference beyond Classical Learning
Asymptotic Analysis of Empirical Risk Minimization on Entry-wise i.i.d. Heavy-Tailed Data
The Geometry of Anisotropic Dilation for Optimal Regularization
Exact Calibration and Sharp Risk Geometry for Volume-Sampled Ridge Regression
Get the few papers worth your time in Methodology every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.