arXiv preprint ·
Does Steering Break Your Model? A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Suite for LLM Steering Methods
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Activation steering provides a lightweight and flexible way to control large language model (LLM) behavior. However, effective steering requires more than inducing the intended behavior: it should also limit unintended changes and remain robust across inputs and training data. Existing evaluations cover these dimensions only in fragments. As a result, the trade-offs between efficacy and side effects have not been systematically characterized. We introduce SteerScope, a two-axis, multi-dimensional evaluation suite that jointly characterizes steering outcomes and method properties through 15 metrics. We score target efficacy and side effects on language quality, task capabilities, and safety and reliability, and further assess generalization and data dependence through steering-specific metrics for sample efficiency and sample sensitivity. Rather than comparing methods at a single operating point, we characterize the trade-offs between efficacy and side effects. Under matched models, tasks, and evaluation protocols, we benchmark 23 methods spanning 4 families, including prompting, LoRA, and SFT as baseline methods, and release the suite as an extensible codebase. We find that current activation steering methods do not yet surpass the Prompt Steering baseline in their overall balance between steering efficacy and side effects: across both model scales, no evaluated activation steering method achieves higher efficacy without incurring greater composite side effects. We further uncover a consistent coupling between steering efficacy and side effects. Under OOD prompts, target efficacy is often preserved, whereas side effects tend to become more pronounced, particularly through declines in instruction relevance and fluency. Methods also exhibit sharply different sample-efficiency profiles.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM Simulations
Adversarial Images Hijack Web Agents from Visual Grounding to Browser Execution
Quality-Aware Self-Correcting Speech Translation on an Edge Device
Dialect-Robust Speech Language Models with Synthetic Pseudo-Dialect Augmentation
HouseholdBench: Evaluating Large Language Models as Predictors of Household Economic Behavior
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.