arXiv preprint ·
Active Feature Acquisition for Cost-Efficient Temporal Prediction with Reduced Participant Burden
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Accurate forecasting of pathological outcomes is a central problem in psychology. To do so, psychologists often collect intensive longitudinal data. However, in such studies, the desire to acquire a large number of variables for the sake of accurate prediction is often counteracted by the need to minimize participant burden. Acquiring more variables per occasion can yield better predictions, but having too many acquisitions increase the risk of non-response and attrition. Longitudinal Active Feature Acquisition (LAFA) is a principled approach to resolve this conundrum. Instead of requiring responses to every item at every acquisition occasion, LAFA produces a policy that seeks to optimally select dynamic subsets of items to be acquired at each timepoint while preserving our ability to forecast a specific outcome. However, existing LAFA methods are mostly based on Neural Networks (NN) that are difficult to interpret in practice. In this work, we introduce a tree distillation method for learning an interpretable policy from NN-based LAFA networks. We validated our method through both a simulation and an empirical EMA dataset on forecasting daily alcohol consumption. In both cases, we find that we can meaningfully reduce the number of items acquired at each occasion with minimal loss in accuracy. Networks (NN) that are difficult to interpret in practice. In this work, we introduce a tree distillation method for learning an interpretable policy from NN-based LAFA networks. We validated our method through both a simulation and an empirical EMA dataset on forecasting daily alcohol consumption. In both cases, we find that we can meaningfully reduce the number of items acquired at each occasion with minimal loss in accuracy.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Errors of LLM-Assisted Literature Retrieval in Environmental Science: A Comparison Study of Abstract versus Full-text Based Prompts
Trustworthy Method Comparison with AI Judges: Estimation and Design under Order, Batch, and Aggregation Effects
Usefulness of Quantile-Aware Diffusion Modeling for Highly Imbalanced Tabular Data
Scalable Regularized Vector Multiplicative Error Models for Positive-valued Financial Time Series
Comparing two approaches for modelling the loss given default of credit cards: Run-off triangles vs regression
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.