arXiv preprint ·
Tracking Is Not Permanence: What Video World Models Keep of a Hidden Object
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Video world models track objects they can see; we ask what they keep of objects they cannot. We hide an object from a frozen V-JEPA 2 predictor and compare its prediction for the hidden region with the encoder's representation of two worlds that differ only inside that region. The predictor's decision keeps a stationary object in part and one carried inside a container not at all, and loses a moving one within 0.3 s (0.5 s under V-JEPA's own tube mask; ViT-H keeps it to 1.1 s at pretraining's 90% masking ratio); in projection a trace remains, below the midpoint, at 14-60% of what a baseline copying the last view retains. The information is there: the encoder reads the object's presence at 1.00 and keeps a closed container's contents decodable for 3.5 s, while the predictor's output, read with the encoder's own probe, contains the ball in 2% of scenes once the box has been closed for half a second. On rendered scenes, permanence is missing on the predictor's side, and training installs it cheaply as a prior: three thousand predictor-only steps on synthetic containers take this belief from 0.05 to 1.00 against two matched controls. They also raise IntPhys-2019 from 84.2% to 93.3%, but so does a curriculum without containers, and which training habit the benchmark credits changes with its scoring rule. Continued training with tube masks produces 1.1-1.6 s of moving-object carry-over on manipulation and internet-style video, so the deficit is not intrinsic to latent prediction. VideoMAE keeps almost nothing, and Cosmos's next-token prediction keeps a stationary hidden object but not one carried inside a moving container.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Automatic Speech Recognition for Low-Resource Sinhala: A Critical Review of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM Simulations
Knowing the Rules, Applying the Rules: Evaluating Language Models on Traditional Chinese Bazi
Quality-Aware Self-Correcting Speech Translation on an Edge Device
Spend Bytes on Breadth: Precision-Count Trade-offs for Decode-Time KV Compression in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.