arXiv preprint ·
Evaluating Escalation Signals for LLM Routing: Targets, Controls, and Five Ways to Fool Yourself
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Deciding when to escalate a query from a small language model to a larger one requires a cheap signal that predicts, before the large model is called, whether escalating would help. Semantic entropy, originally developed to detect hallucinations, is a natural candidate: it measures how much a model's sampled answers disagree in meaning, and high disagreement often signals an unreliable answer. We test it across three benchmarks and two model families. On GSM8K, with a small/large pair about twelve times apart in size, semantic entropy reliably distinguishes the small model's mistakes (AUROC 0.871) and improves routed accuracy over random escalation by up to nine points at matched cost. An earlier strong-looking result on a synthetic benchmark proved misleading: a simple rule based only on question difficulty, with no model involved, matched semantic entropy almost exactly. This paper's main contribution is a set of checks that catch this before it is reported as real. We show that scoring a cheap, question-only difficulty estimate alongside any signal reveals whether the signal adds real information or just tracks how hard a question looks; that two reasonable definitions of "escalation worked" can produce very different results on the same data; that a benchmark can leave almost no room for any signal to beat simply always using the large model; and that the true cost of live sampling can make routing more expensive than calling the large model directly. For a cheaper alternative that reuses cached past outcomes, we show how to predict whether it will work on a new dataset -- confirmed by correctly forecasting a collapse from AUROC 0.908 to chance level (0.518) ahead of time. We offer these as a general checklist for evaluating escalation signals.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM Simulations
Transformer-Based Time-Series Inference of Lindblad Dynamics in Open Quantum Systems
A Systematic Investigation of Bias in Large Language Models for Advertising Relevance
How Should a Prompt Optimizer Spend a Tight Budget? BudgetAPO with Noise-Adaptive Evaluation
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.