arXiv preprint ·
RELACE: retrospective likelihood-based action credit estimation for long-horizon language agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) avoids a separate critic by estimating advantages from rollout groups. For multi-turn agents, however, trajectory-level supervision provides coarse, noisy credit: terminal rewards do not locate errors and can penalize useful actions alongside mistakes. Group-in-Group Policy Optimization (GiGPO) and subsequent methods refine supervision through state-conditioned comparisons, but their credit estimates remain sensitive to downstream decisions and outcomes. We introduce RELACE, Retrospective Likelihood-based Action, a critic-free framework that integrates retrospective action assessment with state-conditioned advantage estimation. RELACE evaluates executed actions through teacher-forced likelihood scoring under both their original contexts and outcome-augmented contexts. Comparing these likelihoods yields a trajectory-normalized retrospective factor that captures outcome-dependent changes in action plausibility, rather than hindsight plausibility alone. We use this factor to reweight discounted task returns and construct local advantages by comparing weighted returns among actions from equivalent states within a task. This couples retrospective relevance with observed reward, producing fine-grained credit that complements trajectory-level GRPO supervision. Temporal smoothing and success-protecting masking further stabilize the local signal. RELACE requires neither auxiliary value nor reward models nor additional autoregressive rollouts for credit estimation. Experiments on ALFWorld and WebShop with Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct demonstrate substantial improvements over GRPO, GiGPO, and HCAPO. With the 1.5B model, RELACE achieves $96.35\%$ success on ALFWorld and $79.43\%$ on WebShop, surpassing GiGPO by $5.47$ and $5.60$ percentage points, respectively.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM Simulations
Transformer-Based Time-Series Inference of Lindblad Dynamics in Open Quantum Systems
A Systematic Investigation of Bias in Large Language Models for Advertising Relevance
How Should a Prompt Optimizer Spend a Tight Budget? BudgetAPO with Noise-Adaptive Evaluation
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.