arXiv preprint ·
Kurate: Scalable Scientific Quality Analysis
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Scientific search systems can find papers that are relevant to a question, but they generally do not assess the quality of the evidence that those papers provide. We present Kurate, a system that uses large language models (LLMs) to assess the quality of published studies. Kurate uses both the paper and its related documents (e.g., the study's trial registration and protocol), and links each of its judgments to the passage of text on which that judgment is based. We applied Kurate to a corpus of 4,347 papers (3,913 of which report randomized trials) and scored each paper on 8 dimensions of study design and reporting: specifically, statistical power, causal identification, preregistration, selective reporting, measurement validity, analysis prespecification, reporting transparency, and conflict of interest and funding. Across the corpus, we found that papers most often exhibited issues with statistical power, selective reporting, and analysis prespecification, although average quality differed between clinical areas. When compared against expert annotations of 60 held-out clinical-trial documents, the information Kurate extracted matched the expert label in 221/242 protocol scorepoints and 294/370 results-publication scorepoints, with AC1 0.94 and 0.81, respectively. Using a well-reputed, high quality clinical trial as a worked example, we show how a single paper's overall grade breaks down into separate judgments, with each linked to specific evidence from the trial's registration, protocol, and published report. Together, these results show that large-scale quality assessment of this kind is feasible, and that it can be used to address meta-scientific research questions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Automatic Speech Recognition for Low-Resource Sinhala: A Critical Review of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM Simulations
Knowing the Rules, Applying the Rules: Evaluating Language Models on Traditional Chinese Bazi
Quality-Aware Self-Correcting Speech Translation on an Edge Device
Spend Bytes on Breadth: Precision-Count Trade-offs for Decode-Time KV Compression in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.