arXiv preprint ·
When Are Concept Bottleneck Model Explanations Faithful and Compact?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Concept bottleneck models (CBMs) are neural classifiers that allow to explain their decisions via high-level concepts, potentially enabling understanding, steering and debugging. However, their explanations are often derived heuristically. Building on formal explainability, we argue they should also be faithful, i.e., not misreport which concepts actually matter. We show that, for widespread CBM architectures, including recent VLM-based variants, faithful explanations must include all concepts in the bottleneck, compromising interpretability when this is large. This result applies to both heuristic and faithful-by-construction formal explanations. To encourage the existence of compact faithful explanations, we suggest i) modeling concepts probabilistically as binary or categorical random variables (rather than logits), and ii) employing per-concept training-time sparsification via group lasso (rather than regular elastic net). We also extend algorithms from formal explainability to CBMs, and show they outperform natural heuristics in terms of guarantees and explanation size. Overall, our work warns against naive interpretability claims and provides formal conditions and practical strategies for ensuring CBMs are as interpretable as advertised.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Two-Sample Testing via Path-based Inference
Is $\sqrt{d}$ Separation Necessary for Gradient EM to Learn Gaussian Mixtures in High Dimensions?
From Pixels, Without Pre-training: Joint Generative and Self-Supervised Representation Learning in One Model
Learning a Mixture of GFlowNets
Retrieval-Based In-Context Learning: A Domain Adaptation Framework
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.