arXiv preprint ·
Copies or Sources? Measuring How LLM Aggregators Count Restated Evidence in Multi-Agent Systems
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Multi-agent systems built on large language models (LLMs) restate observations as a matter of course: relays forward them, shared boards repeat them and discussion rounds echo them. An aggregator that pools such messages should count sources, not statements. We convert a reported probability into units of independent readings, which assigns every restatement a copy weight, 0 for an aggregator that counts sources and 1 for one that counts every statement, and yields the implied decision under any cost structure. Three testbeds hold the evidence fixed and vary how it is restated: message logs with an exact Bayesian oracle, web documents with appended copies, and logs written by LLM agent teams under four communication protocols. Across four models from three providers, a forwarded copy counts for 0.06 to 0.42 of a new reading, mostly because some replies count every statement. On 5% to 40% of logs that state one reading three times, the reported belief implies an early commitment that the oracle never makes. The models that count copies least and most on controlled logs do so on web copies and agent-written logs as well. A one-paragraph declaration of what a copy contributes brings the copy weight on controlled logs to 0.08 or less. A rule that has agents refer to readings instead of restating them cuts belief-implied early commitment from 11.2% to 1.1% and preserves genuine corroboration.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
Disentangling Models from Personas in Heterogeneous LLM Simulations
Transformer-Based Time-Series Inference of Lindblad Dynamics in Open Quantum Systems
A Systematic Investigation of Bias in Large Language Models for Advertising Relevance
How Should a Prompt Optimizer Spend a Tight Budget? BudgetAPO with Noise-Adaptive Evaluation
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.