arXiv preprint ·
Beyond Transport Cost: Routing Differences between Flow Matching and Optimal Transport
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
In generative models, Optimal Transport (OT) is used to improve Flow Matching (FM) by reducing noise-data coupling cost. However, different noise-to-output assignments can yield nearly equal costs, raising a key question. Is cost alone sufficient to guide coupling design? We address this question by separating transport cost from routing, i.e., the destination reached by each noise sample. We show numerically how FM and OT can differ in routing while remaining close in cost. We examine its consequences in learned neural FM. Using the exact FM routing as an oracle, we further construct a routing-aware training coupling and find that it yields a directionally consistent improvement in generation over a cost-matched, cost-only counterpart. Our findings highlight what cost minimization can overlook and motivate using both cost and routing to evaluate the design of OT-based FM couplings. Code will be released upon acceptance.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Visual Grounding Safety in Vision-Language Models
LARK: A Low-Cost, Accurate, Occlusion-Resilient, Kalman Filter-Assisted Tracking System for Image-Guided Surgery
StageVLN: Spatial and Trajectory Auxiliary Guidance for Efficient Vision-Language Navigation
AIMS: Anchor-Integrated Multi-View Synthesis for Scalable Novel View Rendering
Bayesian Data Augmentation for DNN Retraining with Binomial Outcomes in Vision-Based UAV Landing
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.