arXiv preprint ·
Can Prosodic Style Be Inferred from Text Alone? Evidence from Unsupervised Acoustic Clusters
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Much of expressive text-to-speech research rests on an untested assumption that written text carries enough information to select an appropriate prosodic style for its delivery. Text-predicted style models improve listener preference, and expressive-appropriateness evaluation presupposes that context constrains style, yet neither measures the assumption itself. This paper tests it as a falsifiable hypothesis against style labels derived from acoustics alone. For each of six speakers in a 1,200-hour conversational corpus, utterances are clustered in the spaces of five speech models, including a prosody-only control, and the cluster of held-out utterances is predicted from twelve text embedding models. Three controls are applied: utterance length is erased from the speech embeddings; accuracy is scored against the majority-class floor of unbalanced clusters rather than uniform chance; and a bag-of-words baseline measures word identity alone. Text predicts the cluster above that floor for all six speakers (+0.111 top-3 accuracy), but bag-of-words achieves three quarters of this. Sentence embeddings add only +0.026, largest for encoders not trained for sentence semantics and reversed by tree-based probes for all others. Acoustic clusters are not compact in text embedding space in any of 360 configurations. The prosody-only space weakens the association for five speakers, but not for the speaker showing it most strongly. Text thus informs these delivery clusters mainly through word choice, whether as a cue to prosody or as a marker of topic and recording situation, and reference-free style selection cannot assume more.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Agent Behavior as Code: Efficient and Robust LLM Agents with Programmatic Specifications
Automatic Speech Recognition for Low-Resource Sinhala: A Critical Review of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions
Viva La Vida: Verification and Accumulation Failures in Multi-Agent Proof Search
Knowing the Rules, Applying the Rules: Evaluating Language Models on Traditional Chinese Bazi
Cluster Validation Indices as Self-Supervised Objectives for Text Representation Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.