arXiv preprint ·
Measuring Learned Monotone Temporal Aggregation at Matched Admissibility
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Risk regulation imposes directional constraints on scores; we adopt their strict per-input form -- the score monotone non-decreasing in every exposure input -- as a normative commitment. Deployed pipelines -- monotone hand-crafted aggregates feeding sign-constrained gradient boosting -- already satisfy it by composition, so constrained-versus-unconstrained comparisons price a guarantee the incumbent has for free. We instead hold admissibility fixed on both sides and measure what learning the aggregation is worth. Our instrument is a recurrent network whose state is classical risk statistics (an exponentially weighted moving average and a high-water mark with learned transforms), monotone by construction in every input and per MC-dropout sample. The central finding, by functional regression, is a subsumption boundary: a learned monotone channel reproduces the geometrically weighted separable family of hand-crafted statistics, one channel per member, to Spearman $ρ\ge 0.996$, approximates window statistics with measurable ceilings, and fails at consecutivity ($ρ= 0.924$) and time localization (0.628), both structural, and at the exposure floor (0.829), a learnability boundary. One explicit admissible basis repairs each failure (rank correlation 1.000). In or near the separable family, learned and engineered aggregation are substitutes, and the learned channel is never statistically behind at full sample size and specified capacity. Its advantages are incumbent-specific: a committed grid pays up to 0.019 AUC in decay regions it leaves uncovered (the learned channel stays within 0.004 of the strongest engineered consumer at every swept point); the highest-dimensional comparator degrades fastest with scarce data; and beyond the training support, grid-fed tree-ensemble scores go flat while a strictly increasing head keeps ranking. No single incumbent is dominated on all three axes.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
A Dirichlet Mixed-Membership Model for Exact Multivariate Distributional Credibility
Robust enhanced index tracking portfolio selection under distributional uncertainty
Comparing two approaches for modelling the loss given default of credit cards: Run-off triangles vs regression
Landscape-Dependent Performance of Photonic Quantum Solvers in QUBO Feature Selection for Financial Risk Detection
Convex Order Beyond Dimension One: Projection Tests, Counterexamples and Gaussian Mixtures
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.