arXiv preprint ·
FORGE: Verification-Gated Behavioral Repair for Generative Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Generative large language models (LLMs) inherit undesirable behaviors from pre-training, including demographic bias and toxic generation, that often emerge only after deployment and affect a small subset of inputs. A repair should eliminate the identified defect, preserve the model's overall functionality and, ideally, provide correctness guarantees. Existing approaches address this only partially: gradient-based fine-tuning lacks per-instance guarantees and becomes unstable with few defect samples; model editing assumes explicit knowledge replacement rather than behavioral correction; and constraint-based repair is largely restricted to discriminative models with unique target outputs. We present FORGE, a framework for targeted behavioral repair of generative language models that separates defect localization, weight editing, and behavioral verification into independent stages. Its core is a repair abstraction that converts localized defective generation into explicit optimization objectives, enabling verification-oriented repair techniques to operate on autoregressive generation. FORGE is editing-mechanism agnostic: we instantiate it with (1) a constraint-based quadratic optimization method that provides per-sample repair certificates and (2) a null-space projection editor that minimizes interference with the original model distribution, both under the same localization and verification protocol. On five open-source LLMs, FORGE consistently achieves larger reductions in bias and toxicity than gradient-based fine-tuning with minor perplexity degradation. The two backends exhibit complementary performance across architectures, which a lightweight causal probe traces to where toxicity-related signals concentrate. FORGE also remains effective with only a handful of defective examples, where conventional fine-tuning often oscillates or fails to converge.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Agent Behavior as Code: Efficient and Robust LLM Agents with Programmatic Specifications
Automatic Speech Recognition for Low-Resource Sinhala: A Critical Review of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions
Viva La Vida: Verification and Accumulation Failures in Multi-Agent Proof Search
Knowing the Rules, Applying the Rules: Evaluating Language Models on Traditional Chinese Bazi
Cluster Validation Indices as Self-Supervised Objectives for Text Representation Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.