arXiv preprint ·
No Hindsight for LLM Fact-Checkers: Measuring Leakage Channels in Misinformation Detection
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
As automated fact-checking scales on social media, large language model (LLM) verdict scores can look stronger than warranted. One reason is that evaluations mix in information that was not knowable at claim time. Two channels are easy to conflate: outcomes memorized in pre-training and retrieved evidence published after the claim. Yet standard benchmarks rarely separate the two. In this study we measure both channels on AVeriTeC and QuanTemp++ by reconstructing point-in-time evidence conditions and probing for outcome information encoded in model representations. We find substantial evidence of parametric leakage, that can be hidden by the aggregate accuracy, while a simple representation bottleneck reduces this future leakage more efficiently than a mutual-information-based training penalty. We also find that allowing post-claim evidence inflates zero-shot accuracy by 6.3 points in AVeriTeC while the effect is negligible in QuanTemp++, where retrieval provides little post-claim evidence. These results show that misinformation benchmarks can overstate fact-checking performance when they do not account for what information was actually available at claim time.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Agent Behavior as Code: Efficient and Robust LLM Agents with Programmatic Specifications
Automatic Speech Recognition for Low-Resource Sinhala: A Critical Review of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions
Viva La Vida: Verification and Accumulation Failures in Multi-Agent Proof Search
Knowing the Rules, Applying the Rules: Evaluating Language Models on Traditional Chinese Bazi
Cluster Validation Indices as Self-Supervised Objectives for Text Representation Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.