arXiv preprint ·
Probabilistic Pedestrian Forecasts from a Handheld Phone: World-Frame Heat Maps, Visual-Inertial Height Drift, and Evaluation without Ground Truth
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A pedestrian with a phone could be shown where nearby people will be in the next few seconds, if the forecast stays on the ground while the phone moves, is calibrated, and needs only a monocular camera and visual-inertial odometry (VIO). We build and evaluate such a system. People are detected, lifted onto the floor by ray-plane intersection, tracked in a gravity-aligned metric frame, and forecast as per-step probability maps by a small U-Net trained with a negative log-likelihood (NLL) loss on bird's-eye (SDD) and first-person (EgoTraj-Bench) trajectories. On handheld ADVIO recordings, vertical VIO drift and the user's own changes of level silently rescale monocular ground positions (by 87% within 90 s on one clip; on another, all tracks are lost for the last 31% of the clip); keeping the camera's height above the floor constant under a low-pass-filtered altitude avoids this, though it lags on escalators. On the SDD and EgoTraj-Bench test splits, the final forecaster lowers the NLL at 4.8 s by 1.51 and 1.37 nats relative to a fitted constant-velocity Gaussian. Lacking ground truth for people in handheld video, we score forecasts against the tracker's own later raw measurements. In an internally pre-registered evaluation on seven held-out clips, the final forecaster's NLL is lower than the benchmark-fitted baseline's at 1.2, 2.4 and 4.8 s (by 0.17, 0.23 and 0.47 nats; 95% intervals over people exclude zero), but by less than half as much as on the development clips. Exploratory analyses cut both ways: resampling clips instead of people widens the intervals to include zero at 1.2 and 2.4 s, and once both forecasters are recalibrated on the development clips the network is significantly better only at 1.2 s; but two clips run with ADVIO's reference poses favour the network much more when re-run with the phone's own poses. We discuss what such self-consistency scores can and cannot show.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Autoware in Construction: Gap Analysis and LiDAR Perception Toward Off-Road Autonomous Driving
Tackling Sim-to-Real Mismatch Through Sampling-Based Disturbance Observers: From Analytical Models to Learned World Models
CurveCodec 2: Skeleton-agnostic animation compression with a learned entropy model
GJK-CBF: Control Barrier Functions for Convex Rigid Body Collision Avoidance on SE(3)
Bi-manual Stabilization of the Cervical Spine for Safe Physical Human-Robot Interaction in Rolling Maneuvers
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.