arXiv preprint ·
Quantum Machine Learning Protection of Military Quantum Key Distribution Against Cryptographically Camouflaged Attacks
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Quantum key distribution proves its protocol secure and says nothing about the hardware beneath it, so military and government operators fielding it for command-and-control keys monitor the channel for implementation attacks, and that monitoring has a blind spot. An adversary with a kleptographic foothold in the generator of a public per-block value \(x=g^v \pmod p\) can hide attacked blocks in honest noise, gating them on a predicate of its discrete logarithm, making detection a discrete logarithm problem that defeats every efficient classical monitor yet yields to a quantum kernel recovering \(v\) through Shor's algorithm. I formalise these cryptographically camouflaged attacks, reduce their hardness to an established learning separation, prove a single-frequency fidelity kernel cannot represent an interval predicate, and test them on Ghillie, a decoy-state BB84 simulator with a positive key rate to 142 km. From 10- to 14-bit groups over two seeds, a classical monitor reads 0.458 to 0.516 on camouflaged attacks while the quantum kernel reads 1.000, and both catch overt attacks above 0.99. Finite-precision recovery under depolarising noise and a hardened predicate lower the quantum result to 0.916 through 0.983 with the classical monitor at chance, and a feasibility probe on IBM Heron processors tracks the exact kernel within 0.034. A defender can therefore discard precisely the compromised key material, although the advantage is asymptotic, awaits fault tolerance, and holds only when the feature map matches the adversary's predicate, since a low-frequency map reads 0.545 on a residue pattern and 0.982 once aligned.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
Language Model Fingerprinting Requires Rethinking Watermark Teachers
Invisible Ink, Visible Lies: How Production Watermarking Causes LLMs to Hallucinate
Self-Reflection Fine-Tuning: Enhancing Agent Security against Prompt Injection Attacks from Failure Experience
Bounded Reasoning: Cognitive Hierarchy in Human-versus-AI Cyber Defense
CyTReX: Explainable AI-Based Cybersecurity Threat Reasoning Framework for DER Networks
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.