arXiv preprint ·
Saying, Not Knowing: Aggressively GGUF-Quantized Small Language Models Still Write Rare Words They Can No Longer Define
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Post-training quantization to the GGUF format's mixed-precision K-quants is commonly how open-weight language models reach consumer hardware, yet its effect on fine-grained lexical competence is uncharacterized. We audit 27 quantized artifacts across 13 families and four architecture backbones, 0.35B-14B parameters, evaluated down their published ladder to Q2_K (about 2.6 bits per weight), on 429 frequency-validated rare English words under two probes: surface inclusion of a prompt-supplied word and its one-sentence definition, scored by a tiered multi-synonym matcher, its error measured by a blind LLM-judge census of every definition, with human verification. Three regimes emerge at Q2: total collapse into unusable builds, severe semantic dissociation in sub-2B models, and mostly robust preservation above about 3B. In every sub-2B artifact, definitions fall 20-67% below the artifact's baseline, typically several times the inclusion loss. Two controls separate rarity from task difficulty: within the rare set, loss rises with rarity in six of seven sub-2B artifacts, and on a 100-word common-word set rare words lose more than common words in all eight, significantly in six. Tokenizer vocabulary size does not predict the damage (Spearman rho=0.12); parameter count dominates (rho=0.72), confirmed within five of six same-tokenizer families. Q4_K_M remains lexically clean at >=1B. The damage is frequency-graded, provider-dependent, and not calibrated by WikiText-2 perplexity: across nine artifact-matched ladders, near-identical Q2 penalties (44.7%/47.6%) separate an artifact keeping its definitions (3.6%) from one losing them (43.6%). Aggressively quantized small models can keep generating fluent text while no longer knowing what it means, risking hardware-constrained deployments in domains where semantics carries consequences. Validation must be per artifact.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Principled Top-$k$ Selection for Language Models with Hybrid Gradients
Agent Behavior as Code: Efficient and Robust LLM Agents with Programmatic Specifications
DimSteer: Steering LLM Authoring with Automatically Discovered Stylistic Controls
Viva La Vida: Verification and Accumulation Failures in Multi-Agent Proof Search
Language Model Activations Inhabit Privileged Error-Correcting Basins
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.