arXiv preprint ·
Boundaries Agree, Labels Do Not: Intra-Annotator Dynamics as a Kind of Training Data
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Data quality now matters as much as compute for training language models. Much training data comes from human annotation of text, and interpretive annotation has no ground truth that could settle what is "accurate". Two lines of work respond to this. One combines annotators into a "ground truth" and measures how well they agree with each other; the other treats their disagreement as a signal. Both compare different people at one point in time. We measure something else: how well one reader reproduces their own reading of the same text over time. One expert human reader and three LLM families segmented three Sumerian myths and labelled the causal function of each segment with one of seven states. Across runs months apart, the human cut the text in much the same places but named the segments differently, in every myth. The models show no such consistent pattern: their gap between the two layers is positive in some myths and negative in others, and its size varies. The human's label changes are not random: the runs go through much the same functions but start them one step apart, while model runs start them at the same places. We argue that this pattern is a usable measure of data quality and a contamination check: a "human" annotation whose labels are as stable as its boundaries, and whose functions start in sync, looks like a model's.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Principled Top-$k$ Selection for Language Models with Hybrid Gradients
Agent Behavior as Code: Efficient and Robust LLM Agents with Programmatic Specifications
DimSteer: Steering LLM Authoring with Automatically Discovered Stylistic Controls
Viva La Vida: Verification and Accumulation Failures in Multi-Agent Proof Search
Language Model Activations Inhabit Privileged Error-Correcting Basins
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.