arXiv preprint ·
Trust the View That Sees the Target: Mining Cross-View Conflicts for Reliability-Gated Disaster Damage Assessment
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1145/3849732.3857333
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
After a disaster, building damage is assessed from overhead tiles and ground-level photographs, and most methods fuse the two views symmetrically, trusting both equally for every building. This paper focuses on the samples where that assumption fails: the conflict cases, on which two independently trained single-view models disagree. We mine such cases from three paired collections (inspection photographs from the 2025 Eaton wildfire and street-view panoramas from Hurricanes Ian and Milton, each matched to very-high-resolution overhead tiles), where they make up 10-33% of the data. On these samples an oracle that simply trusts the correct view beats every fusion method we tested by 0.37-0.41 accuracy, and the gap survives longer training, calibration, and backbone changes. We recover part of it with a visibility-conditioned reliability gate: a linear model that decides which view to trust from building-visibility features, calibrated per-view confidences, and the disagreement itself. On the wildfire data the gate is the only method that significantly beats calibrated probability averaging (+0.051 on conflicts, p=0.0001) and end-to-end fusion (+0.072, p<10^-4); on the panoramic datasets it matches them. A controlled field-of-view experiment explains why: cropping panoramas toward the building doubles the benefit of fusion, whereas random crops of the same size do not. Finally, the spatial density of conflicts predicts tile-level damage without labels (Spearman r=0.615, p=0.001). Mining conflicts turns "does fusion help?" into "which view should be trusted, where, and why?".
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Diagnosis-Conditioned Spatial Gating and Decoder-Level Supervised Contrastive Learning for Radiology Report Generation
RSure-Agent: Reliable Use of Tool Observations for Remote Sensing Agents
Referring Multi-Object Tracking in Moving-Camera Videos via Global Motion Compensation
One Tile, Multiple Instances: Rethinking MIL for Sparse Diagnostic Evidence
CellSplat4D: PSF-Aware 4D Gaussian Splatting for Sparse Robotic Live-Cell Imaging
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.