arXiv preprint ·

Shared Geometry Is Not Shared Physics: A Layerwise Test of the Platonic Representation Hypothesis in Astronomy

Kshitij Duraphe, Aravind Kannappan, Dun Li Chan, Okiki Famutimi, Yaswant Sai Ejjagiri, Michael J. Smith and John F. Wu

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Instrumentation & Methods for AstrophysicsMachine Learning

Abstract

In this paper we investigate whether geometrically aligned astronomical representations are also scientifically interchangeable. We analyze every layer's representation from 36 pretrained models using cross-matched optical images, infrared images, and spectra. All 139 analyzed model-survey comparisons show significant local-neighborhood alignment somewhere in the network after accounting for the search over depth. However, alignment does not generally increase with network depth and can be stronger for the changes between consecutive computational blocks than for the block outputs themselves. We find that geometry-selected stages under-perform label-selected stages in every image-transfer comparison; moreover, every final HSC-COSMOS-Web model pair is aligned while every redshift transfer has negative R^2. Models can therefore recover a similar cross-survey geometry among astronomical objects without recovering a survey-invariant linear encoding of the physical properties tested here.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Instrumentation & Methods for Astrophysics

Get the few papers worth your time in Instrumentation & Methods for Astrophysics every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics