arXiv preprint ·
One-Step Curvature Probes Miss the Fitting Operator: Retained Capacity and Terminal Null-Space Correction for Continual Learning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A one-step curvature probe evaluates an initial direction, whereas continual learners are judged after reaching comparable new-task fit. In an overparameterized linearization, projected gradient descent converges to $Δ_P=PJ^\top(JPJ^\top)^{-1}r$, and its squared-displacement inflation is exactly the reciprocal of the retained fitting capacity $c_P(r)$. More generally, the terminal old-task quadratic ratio factorizes as $1/[c_P(r)G_{\rm end}(P,r)]$, where $G_{\rm end}$ compares curvature along endpoint directions. In the rank-one case, $G_{\rm end}$ equals the one-step probe gain; for multiple outputs, the two gains can differ. The terminal quadratic also separates into a curvature-optimal fitting floor and an algorithm-dependent null-space excess, motivating terminal null-space correction, which preserves linearized new-task outputs on its Jacobian batch. Controlled checks validate the local quadratic and show that projection can greatly reduce matched-norm curvature while barely changing terminal forgetting. Across common-threshold configurations, projection yields the larger signed old-task loss change in 73/99 matched pairs, retained fitting capacity falls with rank, and fixed-rank comparisons separate terminal forgetting even when probe gain is approximately matched. On Permuted MNIST and Split CIFAR-100, terminal correction decreases signed old-task loss in 166/180 method--dataset--seed pairs under the all-seed intention-to-correct analysis; because acceptance and outcome reporting use the same held-out split, this result is descriptive and test-conditioned. Overall, terminal cost depends jointly on retained fitting capacity, endpoint-direction curvature, and the null-space component selected by optimization.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Seer: Maximum Likelihood Regression for Learning-Speed Curves
Mitigating Over-squashing without Rewiring: A Sheaf Effective Resistance Perspective
Scale-Recursive Rectified Flows for Few-Step Precipitation Ensembles
How RL Reshapes LLM Reasoning: Transferability, Coverage, and Scaling Laws
What Is Lost in Post-Training? Default Collapse and the Loss of In-Context Steerability Across Diverse Perspectives
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.